I think a bigger issue for the first two products to debut are that they're highly anticipated games and both titles have a track record of excellence+. Halo/2 are ranked 97/95, respectively. Zelda is a little harder to gauge, but TP clocked in at 95, and Windwaker (the game this is a sequal to) scored a 96. There's not much edge in these products. Once we get into the level of excellence that these two series bring to the table, there's not really money making opportunities. If this is to be a successful idea, it needs to be for less... for lack of a better word, perfect games. How about "almost universally beloved"?
My basic point is that I don't think anyone in their right mind is going to review either of these games below the low 90's (which is reflected in my bids), but the highest possible score the game can get is 100. I don't think we need the wisdom of the crowd to tell us (or anyone else, for that matter) that Zelda and Halo games are going to get stellar reviews.
4
I think a bigger issue for the first two products to debut are that they're highly anticipated games and both titles have a track record of excellence+. Halo/2 are ranked 97/95, respectively. Zelda is a little harder to gauge, but TP clocked in at 95, and Windwaker (the game this is a sequal to) scored a 96. There's not much edge in these products. Once we get into the level of excellence that these two series bring to the table, there's not really money making opportunities. If this is to be a successful idea, it needs to be for less... for lack of a better word, perfect games. How about "almost universally beloved"?
My basic point is that I don't think anyone in their right mind is going to review either of these games below the low 90's (which is reflected in my bids), but the highest possible score the game can get is 100. I don't think we need the wisdom of the crowd to tell us (or anyone else, for that matter) that Zelda and Halo games are going to get stellar reviews.