I am suspicious of the 54% failure rate but suspect it is indicative of long term owners citing failure.
The 3.8% on the otherhand is testiment to how such failure can be managed and shows that so long as the consumer believes they are fully covered they will live with the inconvenience of potential failure. I do not manufacturers getting excited about this approach as it is serious money and it still makes more financial sense to get it right during pre production.
1
The 3.8% on the otherhand is testiment to how such failure can be managed and shows that so long as the consumer believes they are fully covered they will live with the inconvenience of potential failure. I do not manufacturers getting excited about this approach as it is serious money and it still makes more financial sense to get it right during pre production.