I agree, but it was this imbalance in volume that made the rest of the game near impossible to play. NPRs al
>The game mechanics also do not allow or help a single player to benefit on both buy and sell of a stock. Going opposite of your holding just loses you money.
Clearly, so when you have a cool hundred million in the bank propping up a stock to insulate you from relatively minor losses (following huge gains and net positive) it ruins the game. Going against your holding actually can make you money if you are selling/repositioning via the "invisible hand" (the artificial buy/sells)
>I do not know how this can be fixed without access to regular official sales data to create interest like Facebook social games which encourages regular play.
That's just it, tying stocks to actual sales data and declaring a futures winner, removes the wisdom of the crowd and turns into a pissing contest between timely NPD nerds.
1
I agree, but it was this imbalance in volume that made the rest of the game near impossible to play. NPRs al
>The game mechanics also do not allow or help a single player to benefit on both buy and sell of a stock. Going opposite of your holding just loses you money.
Clearly, so when you have a cool hundred million in the bank propping up a stock to insulate you from relatively minor losses (following huge gains and net positive) it ruins the game. Going against your holding actually can make you money if you are selling/repositioning via the "invisible hand" (the artificial buy/sells)
>I do not know how this can be fixed without access to regular official sales data to create interest like Facebook social games which encourages regular play.
That's just it, tying stocks to actual sales data and declaring a futures winner, removes the wisdom of the crowd and turns into a pissing contest between timely NPD nerds.