Username
Password
Remember me
Forgot your password?
|
Need confirmation email?
join
data
game news
forum
blog
help
join for free!
Forum Filter
- Channel -
General
Help
Listed Games
Unlisted Games
Game Companies
------------
Activision Blizzard
Atari
Electronic Arts
Konami
Microsoft
Midway Games
Nintendo
Sony
Take-Two
THQ
Ubisoft
tools for bloggers
web code
Amazon.com Widgets
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
Submit a comment
bids
2
daedelus
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 10:32PM PST on January 27, 2007.
This game looks hot! KOTOR is a great game, and I think that alone could carry this a long way. Plus, it just looks so cool.
[ Veteran ]
[ Level 13 ]
[ Rank: 754 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
bids
1
KaUkIlLeR
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 8:38PM PST on January 9, 2007.
Could you lower this somewhat? just to 125 or so?
[ Veteran ]
[ Level 9 ]
[ Rank: 1065 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
bids
3
KaUkIlLeR
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 7:43PM PST on December 10, 2006.
I'm waiting for this one. Its going to be big
[ Veteran ]
[ Level 9 ]
[ Rank: 1065 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
bids
2
sjohn
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 10:58AM PST on December 9, 2006.
If you guys haven't checked the walkthrough video, they've got a pretty good quality copy here:
http://www.360-hq.com/Mass_Effect_Xbox_360_Movies-17.html
[ Lurker ]
[ Level 7 ]
[ Rank: 5789 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
bids
2
OrkEater
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 9:32AM PST on December 9, 2006.
Yeah, cant wait for this, it looks amazing, although the gameplay may drag along.. just a guess.
[ Speaker ]
[ Level 6 ]
[ Rank: 1671 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
bids
3
Shamed_Jedi
posted on
Mass Effect (Xbox 360)
at 11:46AM PST on December 6, 2006.
I hope to buy shares of this game and track it. If nothing else, this game will give a hint of what KOTOR III could possibly be on the XBox 360.
[ Newbie ]
[ Level 6 ]
[ Rank: 1636 ]
Permalink
|
Reply
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
About Us
-
The simExchange
is the video game stock market and the source for
video game sales
forecasts.
Learn why you should join >
2