I agree that the things you listed shouldn't be ignored: UK sales, lower sales, control/content.
I am merely saying that the article is claiming a "trend" in the increase of PS3 sales which will ultimately end up with PS3 overcoming the 360 and have more games sold. This is a false claim.
It is not based on real statistics. Just because there is a correlation between time and a lowering ratio of 360 to PS3 game sales does not mean that time is the cause of it.
To define a true trend, there are other factors to consider - particularly the total number of consoles in households, individual game trends, total number of copies sold, etc.
The two consoles are at different points in their life cycle and they are growing at different rates in different locations.
I think this article is just another case of using misleading "statistics" to come to a predetermined conclusion. That is all.
3
I agree that the things you listed shouldn't be ignored: UK sales, lower sales, control/content.
I am merely saying that the article is claiming a "trend" in the increase of PS3 sales which will ultimately end up with PS3 overcoming the 360 and have more games sold. This is a false claim.
It is not based on real statistics. Just because there is a correlation between time and a lowering ratio of 360 to PS3 game sales does not mean that time is the cause of it.
To define a true trend, there are other factors to consider - particularly the total number of consoles in households, individual game trends, total number of copies sold, etc.
The two consoles are at different points in their life cycle and they are growing at different rates in different locations.
I think this article is just another case of using misleading "statistics" to come to a predetermined conclusion. That is all.