@Just_Ben, But that's the problem with assumed knowledge: the people who should be most responsible for spreading the knowledge don't mention it anymore, because it's assumed. Then all the headway made into ingraining people with a sense of perspective about VGC's numbers is lost, because newbies come in, see top 20 people throwing out VGC numbers WITHOUT ANY KIND OF DISCLAIMER, and think that VGC is a valid source of hard data.
I've made all my points before, and frankly I'm sick of repeating them. If people don't want to listen, what's the point?
2
But that's the problem with assumed knowledge: the people who should be most responsible for spreading the knowledge don't mention it anymore, because it's assumed. Then all the headway made into ingraining people with a sense of perspective about VGC's numbers is lost, because newbies come in, see top 20 people throwing out VGC numbers WITHOUT ANY KIND OF DISCLAIMER, and think that VGC is a valid source of hard data.
I've made all my points before, and frankly I'm sick of repeating them. If people don't want to listen, what's the point?