Well I'd like to address your question, but first I want to say you made a great point about GH3 sales. I hadn't really thought of it that way (games like GH as an indicator).
I believe the same was true of Madden games as they moved to PS2. It just has to do with install base. We've already established that while a slow start, the PS3 is performing slightly below par set by the PS2 which went on to sell quite a few units.
I think if we're predicting sales of 60 million PS3 consoles in the end, and LPB will be released in what is typically the heaviest adoption season (third christmas) in a consoles life cycle, this could do far better than you are predicting. I can see the holiday ad campaign now..that is of course if Sony doesn't screw up the whole thing!
Well, nice (friendly) debating but we'll never get based our fundamental argument: I believe LBP's potential is greater than just being a million seller, whether my reasons prove to be unfounded or not. You disagree, and I can live with that. Thanks for explaining your position.
1
Well I'd like to address your question, but first I want to say you made a great point about GH3 sales. I hadn't really thought of it that way (games like GH as an indicator).
I believe the same was true of Madden games as they moved to PS2. It just has to do with install base. We've already established that while a slow start, the PS3 is performing slightly below par set by the PS2 which went on to sell quite a few units.
I think if we're predicting sales of 60 million PS3 consoles in the end, and LPB will be released in what is typically the heaviest adoption season (third christmas) in a consoles life cycle, this could do far better than you are predicting. I can see the holiday ad campaign now..that is of course if Sony doesn't screw up the whole thing!
Well, nice (friendly) debating but we'll never get based our fundamental argument: I believe LBP's potential is greater than just being a million seller, whether my reasons prove to be unfounded or not. You disagree, and I can live with that. Thanks for explaining your position.