@vGInfidel, I believe that TSE can do a recognition based on transaction completion date & time. I am not sure whether TSE can do recognition based on order placement date and time.
I would suggest that it is based on transaction execution / completion, not order placement.
1% of networth is a little bit too big IMO. 1% of 1 Million is 10K, which is what I proposed. However, the majority of player are not 1 Million networth, they would be around 2 - 4 Million Networth. In addition, changing criteria to 1% of networth is a BIGGER change than what I proposed (in addition to transaction based, it is also percentage based), and the logic to implement it could be more difficult and more resource (CPU) intensive, which is usually a bad thing.
@oznerol, You might be correct for the futures titles, but not GLS titles. Otherwise, how could you explain the current H/W # ?
Taking profits of stocks you have shorted can only be done WHEN the price has reached your target price. When it is still significantly above your target price, it means you are "cashing out too early", just to utilize your time trust money, which means it takes longer for the price to reach your target price (it might even NEVER reach it, thanks to lots of player "utilizing their time trust money").
I have been uneasy about time trust usage for the last few months, but I haven't found any alternative to it before, so I keep quiet about it.
To all player, Changing time trust to my suggestion also mean one very important things : We might find it impossible or much harder to find short opportunities in the future, since most stocks are going to be more "rationally priced", since the major factor that inflate stock price, "time trust", is gone. So please keep this probable negative factor into consideration when responding to my suggestion.
1
I believe that TSE can do a recognition based on transaction completion date & time. I am not sure whether TSE can do recognition based on order placement date and time.
I would suggest that it is based on transaction execution / completion, not order placement.
1% of networth is a little bit too big IMO. 1% of 1 Million is 10K, which is what I proposed. However, the majority of player are not 1 Million networth, they would be around 2 - 4 Million Networth. In addition, changing criteria to 1% of networth is a BIGGER change than what I proposed (in addition to transaction based, it is also percentage based), and the logic to implement it could be more difficult and more resource (CPU) intensive, which is usually a bad thing.
@oznerol,
You might be correct for the futures titles, but not GLS titles. Otherwise, how could you explain the current H/W # ?
Taking profits of stocks you have shorted can only be done WHEN the price has reached your target price. When it is still significantly above your target price, it means you are "cashing out too early", just to utilize your time trust money, which means it takes longer for the price to reach your target price (it might even NEVER reach it, thanks to lots of player "utilizing their time trust money").
I have been uneasy about time trust usage for the last few months, but I haven't found any alternative to it before, so I keep quiet about it.
To all player,
Changing time trust to my suggestion also mean one very important things :
We might find it impossible or much harder to find short opportunities in the future, since most stocks are going to be more "rationally priced", since the major factor that inflate stock price, "time trust", is gone. So please keep this probable negative factor into consideration when responding to my suggestion.